Office At Sunnyside, High Street, Halmer End, Halmer End, ST7 8AG
Land Used for Storage and Premises Decided 26 November 2020 25370246 Evans & Payne
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought deletion from the rating list, arguing the property was an agricultural building converted in 2009 and should be treated as a domestic appurtenance. The tribunal found the property remained rateable because identifiable boundaries (fences and barriers) separated it from the main house, preventing it from being enjoyed as part of the residential curtilage. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part by removing £593 for plant and machinery not present at inspection, reducing the RV from £6,500 to £5,900.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Graham Heath Construction Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Relief or exemption · decisive
- Validity of the proposal
- Other
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Corkish (VO) v Bigwood [2019] UKUT 191 (LC); Bigwood v Valuation Officer [2017] VTE (382525090009/537N10); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 5 November 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.