At 16-16a, Brickfields Road, WR4 9TH
Decided 24 May 2022 25539010 Johnson Fellows - Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appeal concerned an ATM entry and was one of several hundred similar appeals that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and concluded that this appeal was redundant, as more than one appeal had been lodged against the same list entry. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.