Ancient High House, 48 Greengate Street, ST16 2JA
Museum and premises Decided 28 November 2023 25591027 Lambert Smith Hampton - Birmingham
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to reduce the rateable values of three properties (Ancient High House, Stafford and Industrial Heritage Museum, Coalville) arguing they should be classified as museums with assessments made using the receipts and expenditure method, which would result in RV £1. The Valuation Officer contended the properties were historical buildings, not museums, and should be valued using a shortened percentage method. The tribunal found both properties were museums based on their actual use and collections of exhibits, rejected the VO's outdated historical buildings valuation guidance as lacking legal basis, and agreed that the receipts and expenditure method was appropriate for museums, resulting in RV £1 for all three appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Stafford Borough Council, represented.
Grounds argued
- Valuation method
- Split or merge the assessment
- Change of circumstances
- building demolition
- Evidence
- Photographs, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Hoare v National Trust; Hughes (VO) v York Museums and Gallery Trust; Hughes (VO) v Exeter City Council; Allen (VO) v Tyne & Wear Archives and Museums; Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council and York Museums and Galleries Trust v Sykes
- Hearing
- 6 November 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.