Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2010 rating list

Atm Site At 798b, Alcester Road South, B14 5EZ

Automatic Teller Machine Decided 3 May 2022 26554340

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£8,300
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,300from 1 Apr 2015

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged a Valuation Officer's notice of alteration assessing an ATM at £8,300 RV effective from 1 August 2014, which was later deleted from 1 April 2015. The appellant's proposal was served on 4 January 2016, over 6 months after the original alteration. The tribunal found that under Regulation 14(2A) of the Non-Domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) Regulations 2009, the exception allowing an earlier effective date only applies if a proposal is made within 6 months of the alteration. Since this condition was not met, the earliest effective date was restricted to 1 April 2015, leaving the £8,300 entry effective for the period 1 August 2014 to 31 March 2015, which the tribunal could not alter. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Effective date · decisive
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21
Hearing
26 April 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.