Tribunals · Rother District Council · 2010 rating list

Equestrian Centre At Court Lodge Farm, Sandhurst Road, Bodiam, Bodiam, East Sussex, TN32 5UJ

Stables and premises Decided 24 March 2021 29861133 C.V.S. (Commercial Valuers & Surveyors) Ltd.

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£25,000
Ratepayer sought£4,300
VO conceded first£20,250−19% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£19,750from 1 Apr 2015

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that 20 stables and associated equine facilities adjacent to the Oast House should be exempt from rating as domestic property and appurtenances to the dwelling under section 66(1)(b) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. The tribunal found that the stables were not an appurtenance to the house because they were owned by The Propane Company Ltd whilst the Oast House was owned by Miss Jessica Sternberg separately, and the stables were not mentioned in the title deeds. The tribunal therefore determined the stables should remain rateable but allowed the appeal in part by reducing the value of 6 indoor loose boxes within the equestrian centre from £250 to £200 per unit, and declined to apply an end allowance for planning restrictions.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Propane Company Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Relief or exemption · decisive
  • Valuation method
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Expert report, Photographs, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Methuen-Campbell v Walters; Trim v Sturminster RDC; Martin v Hewitt; Seabrook v Alexander; Levinson v Robeson and Gray; The Collection (Management) Ltd v Jackson; Head v Tower Hamlets LBC; Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Robinson Bros (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-Le-Street Assessment Committee; K Shoe Shops Ltd v Hardy; Oldschool & Oldschool v Coll; Telereal Trillium v K Hewitt; BPP Holdings Ltd Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Galgate Cricket Club v Doyle
Hearing
25 February 2021

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.