Burgh Farm Dressage, Norwich Road, Mattishall, Mattishall, NR20 3LL
Stables and premises Decided 25 February 2021 CHG100074804 Steven Bicknell
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that five stables in a lean-to building were appurtenant to the dwelling and should be exempt from non-domestic rating as domestic property used for personal hobby purposes. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the stables were remote from the domestic curtilage of the dwelling, separated by fencing, hedging and the farm access road, and situated within the farm/livery business facilities rather than within the domestic curtilage. Unlike the Bourne Hill case cited, the property operates a livery business and lacks the characteristics of a purely domestic setting.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Burgh Farm Dressage, represented.
Grounds argued
- Relief or exemption
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Corkish v Bigwood; Martin v Hewitt
- Hearing
- 17 February 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.