Tribunals · Harlow District Council · 2017 rating list

Unit E, Riverway, CM20 2SN

Go-kart track and premises Decided 8 March 2023 CHG100219664 Dunlop Heywood

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£184,000
Ratepayer sought£139,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£184,000£52.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the go-kart racetrack was a demountable, bespoke structure installed by the tenant as part of its business operations and should be excluded from the valuation as a chattel, proposing an RV of £139,000. Alternatively, if rated, it should be valued using decapitalisation of installation costs (£148,000). The Tribunal found that the racetrack was a substantial, weight-bearing structure akin to a mezzanine floor that had become an integral part of the building, citing the Wilkinson test for assessing whether items are chattels or part of the hereditament. The Tribunal concluded that as a tenant improvement to an indoor go-kart venue, the track would add value to the property and upheld the VO's valuation at £184,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Go Karting for Fun Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Wilkinson (VO) v Edmundson Electrical Limited; Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Ltd; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson (VO)
Hearing
21 February 2023

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.