Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Hambleton District Council · 2017 rating list

The Barn at Manor House Farm, Newsham, Thirsk, Thirsk, Y07 4DJ

Barn and premises Decided 7 September 2023 CHG100728471 Summerfield Browne Solicitors

OutcomeAllowed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£12,750from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Manor Storage, The Barn at Manor House Farm, Newsham, North Yorkshire, YO7 4DJThis appeal——£12,750Allowed
Caravan Storage North Yorkshire, The Barn at Manor House Farm, Newsham, North Yorkshire, YO7 4DJ——£7,500Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that two barns at Manor House Farm should be separately assessed rather than treated as one hereditament. The tribunal found that the smaller barn was occupied by a different company (the appellant's son's business) and satisfied the four ingredients of rateable occupation: actual occupation, beneficial occupation, exclusive occupation, and occupation that was not too transient. The tribunal allowed the appeal because each barn constituted a separate rateable occupation, with distinct businesses, separate contact details, websites and paperwork, demonstrating that the appellant did not have paramount control over the smaller barn.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment · decisive
Evidence
Expert report
Cases cited
R(Curzon Berkeley Ltd) v S P Bliss (Valuation Officer); Atos IT Services Ltd v Fylde Borough Council; City of Westminster v Southern Railway; John Laing & Son Ltd v Kingswood Area Assessment Committee; Glenwright (Valuation Officer) v St Nicholas Parochial Church Council; Cardtronics Uk Ltd and Others v Sykes and others
Hearing
8 August 2023

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.