Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that three car parking spaces should be deleted from the 2017 rating list (or reduced to nil value) as they should have been merged into the main office assessment rather than assessed separately, particularly as they were contiguous with the main office hereditament. The tribunal found that while the separate assessments may have been erroneous, the appellant's proposal only requested a reduction to nil, not a merger. As no merger proposal was submitted and the car parking spaces had genuine value (circa £350 each), the tribunal could not reduce the entries to nil without losing that value from the list. The appeals were therefore dismissed and the original rateable values were retained.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Wigan Metropolitan Development Co Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Split or merge the assessment
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- Expert report
- Hearing
- 2 May 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.