Atm At 37a, Neal Street, WC2H 9PR
Decided 24 May 2022 25297662 DTZ
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was an ATM-related appeal previously stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and determined this appeal was redundant due to multiple appeals having been lodged against the same list entry. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm Site At 142, Southampton Row, WC1B 5AG — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.