Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Tower Hamlets · 2005 rating list

Tower Bridge House Floor 2, St Katharines Way, London, London, E1W 1AA

Offices and premises Decided 1 April 2021 27529317 Rabbette

OutcomeStruck outThe appeal was struck out.
Original RV · 2005 list£600,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 24 Aug 2006

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2005 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2005 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
2nd Floor, Tower Bridge House, St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1AAThis appeal£600,000——Struck out
6th Floor, Tower Bridge House, St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1AA£605,000——Struck out

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Mazars LLP appealed the Valuation Officer's notice of alteration dated 13 July 2016, which had given effect to a settlement agreement made in July 2016 applying a 5% end allowance to reflect city office oversupply. The appeals challenged the accuracy of the resulting list entries. The Tribunal struck out both appeals as having no reasonable prospect of success on the basis of res judicata (issue estoppel), since the base rate of £250 per m² had already been determined by the VTE and Upper Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the ratepayer could not relitigate the same issue and was seeking a second bite of the cherry, which constituted an abuse of process, as the proposals were served within one month of the agreements and all evidence was available at the time the settlement was made.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mazars LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
  • Validity of the proposal · decisive
Change of circumstances
office oversupply
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Thorntons Plc and Clarion Solicitors Ltd [2018] UKUT 0109 (LC); Co-operative Group, Poundland and Virk (VO) and Battelle Agrifood and Sykes (VO) [2020] UKUT 286 (LC); Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] HL 2 AC; Society of Medical Officers of Health v Hope (VO) [1960] HL AC551; appeal of Michael Pearce (VO) [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC); Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93; Arnold v Dearing [2019] UKUT 224 (LC)
Hearing
19 March 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.