Bst & Gnd Fs 17-23, Farringdon Road, EC1M 3HA
Decided 3 March 2023 28976617 DTZ
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to appear or be represented at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer regarding the rateable value entry in the 2010 list. The tribunal, satisfied that the appellant had been properly notified and in the interests of proportionality and avoiding delay, proceeded in the appellant's absence and dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the list to be correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 2nd Floor, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.