Tribunals · Dorset Council · 2017 rating list

The Nags Head, Silver Street, DT7 3HS

Public house and premises Decided 12 November 2020 CHG100060319 Whitestone Commercials - Chris Lambert

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£25,000
Ratepayer sought£9,200
VO conceded first£20,500−18% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£20,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the wet trade percentage and sought a 25% reduction for overtrading and customer amenity costs, proposing an RV of £9,200. The Valuation Officer reduced the assessment from £25,000 to £20,500 during the challenge stage by reclassifying the property from Category 1 to Category 3. The tribunal found no credible evidence of overtrading; the trading figures actually supported the FMT used and did not demonstrate that a typical operator could not achieve the stated figures. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellant failed to prove the case for reduction.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
  • Quantum or end allowance
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Watney Mann Ltd v Langley (VO) [1963]; Jack in the Green v VOA; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
28 October 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Dorset Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.