Tribunals · Salford City Council · 2017 rating list

Pharmatube, 1-2 Shield Drive, M28 2QB

Factory and premises Decided 11 August 2021 CHG100094930 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought£56,000
VO conceded first£58,500
Tribunal decided£58,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a 4% split unit end allowance, arguing that two units had been combined resulting in duplication of offices and toilets, warranting a rent reduction. The tribunal was not satisfied this issue was a disability warranting special adjustment, as there was insufficient documentary evidence and no internal photographs or plans to support the claim. However, the Valuation Officer conceded the rateable value was wrong due to two air compressors that had been removed from the property before the 2017 list date, and both parties agreed the plant and machinery element should be reduced from £1,008 to £704. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part on this basis, reducing the rateable value to £58,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pharmatube Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
Cases cited
Pharmatube Ltd v Mr D Grace (Valuation Officer)
Hearing
19 July 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Salford City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.