Tribunals · Wiltshire Council · 2017 rating list

The Silver Plough Inn, The Silver Plough Inn, SP5 1DU

Public house and premises Decided 7 June 2021 CHG100098831 GL Hearn Limited

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£37,250
Ratepayer sought£27,800
VO conceded first£35,000−6% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£35,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the FMT of £170,000 wet and £300,000 dry was excessive, citing a temporary boost from contractors at the nearby Porton Down construction project, competition from new licensed properties, and declining trade trends. The tribunal found the current FMT figures were reasonable and that insufficient evidence had been provided to support the claimed impacts, noting that comparable properties near the same construction project had not shown similar trade declines, and that the hypothetical tenant would not have known of future trade at the AVD. The appeal was dismissed and the RV remained at £35,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels) · decisive
  • Change of circumstances
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Change of circumstances
construction project contractors
Evidence
Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Hearing
13 May 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wiltshire Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.