Tribunals · Brighton and Hove City Council · 2017 rating list

The Camelford Arms, 30-31 Camelford Street, BN2 1TQ

Public house and premises Decided 4 March 2021 CHG100104078

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£59,000
Ratepayer sought£15,400
VO conceded first£53,000−10% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£53,000

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (owner-occupier) argued the fair maintainable trade (FMT) valuation was too high and that he had been overtrading due to his level of service and food quality, which another landlord could not replicate. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no credible evidence of overtrading; the appellant failed to provide additional trade figures when requested, and the FMT of £530,000 wet and £100,000 dry receipts was consistent with comparable properties in the area and properly applied under the Approved Guide.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels) · decisive
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Watney Mann Ltd v Langley (VO) [QB 1963]
Hearing
18 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.