Tribunals · Cambridge City Council · 2017 rating list

Bubble Tap Limited, 22 Lion Yard, Unit 51, Unit 51, CB2 3NA

Shop and premises Decided 10 June 2022 CHG100319825

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£44,750£1225/m²
Ratepayer sought£20,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£44,750£1225/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, operating as Bubble Tap Ltd from 22 Lion Yard, Cambridge, argued the rateable value of £44,750 was excessive and sought £20,000 based on their new lease rent of £12,000 per annum. The appellant contended the property was located outside the main shopping centre with lower rents, and that comparable properties were rented by national chains at inflated rates not representative of independent businesses. The tribunal applied the Lotus and Delta v Culverwell principles, finding the appellant's lease (commenced November 2017, over two years after the antecedent valuation date) was not sufficiently reliable standing alone, but the Valuation Officer's basket of comparable properties supported a zone A rate of £1,225/m² as reasonable for properties outside the main centre, and the resulting RV did not seem excessive when compared to other units in the shopping centre.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bubble Tap Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
  • Change of circumstances
Evidence
Rents, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
12 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Cambridge City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.