Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Bedford Borough Council · 2017 rating list

Charles Wells, Havelock Street, Havelock Street, Havelock Street, MK40 4JL

Brewery and Premises; Pipeline, Borehole and Appurtenances Decided 31 March 2025 CHG100434646 Colliers

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£700,000
Ratepayer sought£385,000
VO conceded first£680,000−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£738,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Bedford Brewery, Havelock Street, Bedford, MK40 4JLThis appeal£700,000£385,000£738,000Allowed
Pipeline, Park Road North to Charles Wells, Havelock Street, Bedford, MK40 4JL£51,000——Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge two hereditaments (brewery assessed at £680,000 RV and pipeline/borehole assessed at £51,000 RV) into a single unit. The tribunal found they constituted one hereditament functionally and geographically. The appellant's proposed valuation of £385,000 was rejected as it sought an unjustified 44% superfluity allowance for alleged overcapacity, which lacked merit on the evidence. The tribunal adopted the contractor's basis and valued the merged hereditament at £738,000 RV, including a modest allowance for pipeline age/obsolescence and rejecting both parties' extreme positions.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Marstons Plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment · decisive
  • Valuation method
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Expert report
Cases cited
Woolway (VO) v Mazars [2015] UKSC 53; Dawkins (VO) v Royal Leamington Spa Corporation [1961] 8 RRC 241; 178 EG 293; Cardiff City Council v Williams (VO) [1973] RA 46; (1973) 226 EG 613; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Hughes and Exeter City Council [2020] UKUT 0007 (LC)
Hearing
17 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bedford Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.