Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

Liverpool Street Railway Station, Liverpool Street, EC2M 7PY

Advertising Rights within Railway Premises Decided 1 June 2023 CHG100706379 Dentons UK and Middle East LLP - Gemma Louise Hunter-Barnes

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought£0
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£0from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited appealed against the Valuation Officer's decision to enter two advertising rights within railway stations (Liverpool Street and Victoria) as separate hereditaments in the local rating list. Network Rail argued these rights formed part of the railway hereditament and should be assessed centrally. The tribunal found that Network Rail retained paramount control over the advertising space through extensive contractual powers to withdraw, disturb, obstruct or temporarily repurpose the advertising sites for operational and safety announcements. Applying the landlord/lodger principle from Halkyn and Cardtronics, the tribunal concluded the advertising rights had not been let out but rather remained part of the railway occupation, used for railway purposes, and should be deleted from the local list and reflected only in the Central List assessment.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
  • Validity of the proposal · decisive
Evidence
Expert report, Trading accounts
Cases cited
R v St Pancras Assessment Committee; Holywell Union Assessors v Halkyn; John Laing & Sons v Kingswood Assessment Committee; Westminster City Council v Southern Railway Company; Peak (VO) v Henlys; Imperial Tobacco Company v Pierson; O'Brien v Secker (VO); Cardtronics Europe Ltd v Sykes (VO); Esso Petroleum Company v Walker (VO); Woolway (VO) v Mazars LLP; Ludgate House Ltd v Ricketts (VO)
Hearing
11 May 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.