MEREDITH AND EYRE LTD, BROADWAY IND ESTATE, SK14 4QF
Factory and premises Decided 9 January 2024 CHG100813743 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that a 5% end allowance should be applied to reflect poor layout issues caused by three warehouses separated by walls with small openings and three external stores with external access only. The tribunal found that while layout issues existed, particularly a half-meter difference in floor levels between bays affecting vehicle movement, a 2.5% end allowance (rather than the sought 5%) was appropriate to reflect these disadvantages. The appeal was allowed in part, reducing the RV from £97,000 to £94,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Meredith and Eyre Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Zoning or layout
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- J Rosenthal & Son Ltd v Rushall (VO); The Occupier v Stauder (VO); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 11 December 2023
Similar decisions
- RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, GLOBE LANE, SK16 4UJ — Dismissed, 8 May 2026
- Ryecroft Foods Ltd, Smith Street, OL7 0DB — Struck out, 24 May 2021
All decisions in Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.