Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Peterborough City Council · 2017 rating list

Whsmith, Whsmith, PE1 1QL

Cafe and premises Decided 5 December 2024 CHG100929564 Tanner Rose

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£64,500
Ratepayer sought£59,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£64,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (WHSmith, Ticket Hall at Peterborough Station, Peterborough PE1 1QL). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pumpkin Cafe, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£95,500£86,000£95,500Dismissed
Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£65,500£60,250£65,500Dismissed
WHSmith, Ticket Hall at Peterborough Station, Peterborough PE1 1QLThis appeal£64,500£59,000£64,500Dismissed
Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, Norwich, NR1 1EG£77,500£72,500£77,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the MGR (Minimum Guaranteed Rent) alone should be used to value the properties, contending that top-ups were specific to the occupying tenant and not indicative of open market rent. The Valuation Officer argued that any prospective tenant would factor top-ups into their rental bid. The tribunal found that actual rents paid around the antecedent valuation date exceeded the MGR (except for one property), supporting the use of actual passing rents rather than MGR alone in establishing rateable value, and dismissed the appeals as the appellant failed to demonstrate the valuations were unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Select Service Partner Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
11 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Peterborough City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.