C C A Occasions Limited, Unit 91, PR26 7QS
Factory and premises Decided 30 April 2024 CHG101068974 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors/Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought allowances for lack of natural light in the kitchen/canteen area (2.5%), major stanchions within the building (2.5%), and fragmented layout (5%), along with other valuations adjustments, seeking to reduce the RV from £207,000 to £188,000. The tribunal found the appellant's representative had not produced substantive evidence to support the proposed allowances, with limited comparable properties and no supporting examples. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, maintaining the RV at £205,000 effective from 1 April 2021.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was CCA Occasions Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; The Occupier v Stauder; J Rosenthal & Son Ltd v Rushall; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 9 April 2023
Similar decisions
- M I Vehicle Integration, Aston Way, PR26 7TZ — Dismissed, 29 Jun 2026
- Holme Road, Bamber Bridge, PR5 6BQ — Dismissed, 28 Nov 2022
All decisions in South Ribble Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.