Tribunals · Bedford Borough Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT 2, INTERCHANGE RETAIL PARK, RACE MEADOWS WAY, MK42 7AZ

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 15 April 2025 CHG101081113 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£155,000£170/m²
Ratepayer sought£87,000
VO conceded first£127,000−18% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£114,000£125/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged a rateable value of £155,000 (based on £170/m²), proposing £87,000 (£95.50/m²). The challenge officer reduced it to £127,000 (£140/m²). The tribunal found the original assessment unreasonable. Whilst the actual rent (£151,860 from 2018) received little weight as it was post-AVD, comparable properties—particularly Unit 4-5 at the same location which had been agreed at £95.50/m²—supported a lower valuation. The tribunal found a quantum allowance inappropriate when larger merged units received the same rate. Accordingly, the tribunal reduced the valuation to £114,000 (£125/m²).

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dreams Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Futures London Limited v Stratford
Hearing
24 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bedford Borough Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.