Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

Pantry Store Level 24 The Shard 31, St Thomas Street, SE1 9RY

Offices and premises Decided 1 April 2025 CHG101088252 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£8,800£550/m²
Ratepayer sought£8,300
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,300£550/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 50 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values of 50 serviced office units at The Shard on the basis that a tone of £550/m² was excessive, seeking £500/m² or lower, and that a 5% end allowance should apply for the period 1 April 2017 to 31 January 2022 due to demolition and reconstruction of the adjacent Fielden House. The tribunal found the base price of £550/m² was not unreasonable based on analysis of the subject rent and comparable evidence, particularly Rear Part Level 2 which analysed to £604/m² on the antecedent valuation date. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument that the 'Tower uplift' should be removed from the 17 southern-facing suites as no credible evidence demonstrated these units were disadvantaged. However, the valuation officer had conceded that a 5% allowance for material change of circumstances was reasonable for the period of works (except for Suites 2511 and 2512 which had already benefited), and the tribunal allowed 48 appeals in part by reducing the list entries by 5% for that period only.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Office Group Holdings Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
demolition and reconstruction of adjacent building
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited; Specialeyes Plc v Felgate (VO)
Hearing
5 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.