Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Three Rivers District Council · 2023 rating list

29 ORBITAL 25 BUSINESS PARK, TOLPITS LANE,, WD18 9DA

Warehouse and premises Decided 17 December 2025 CHG101146562 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£49,250
Ratepayer sought£42,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£43,750from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (29 Orbital 25 Business Park, Tolpits Lane, Watford WD18 9DA). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
29 Orbital 25 Business Park, Tolpits Lane, Watford WD18 9DAThis appeal£49,250£42,000£43,750Allowed in part
34 Orbital 25 Business Park, Tolpits Lane, Watford WD18 9DA£49,250£42,000£43,750Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of two warehouse units with office space on an industrial estate, arguing the original RV of £49,250 was unreasonable and should be reduced to £42,000. The tribunal analysed comparable rental evidence on the same business park, particularly a property let at £30,000 per annum. After evaluating the appellant's analysis of comparable properties (rents ranging from £130-£152/m²) against the VO's higher analysis, the tribunal found the original rate of £162.50/m² was too high but the proposed £140/m² was too low. The tribunal determined a reasonable unadjusted rate of £145/m² based on comparable rental evidence, resulting in an RV of £43,750.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Vape Club Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
17 November 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Three Rivers District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.