UNITS 56 & 57 TRINITY TRADE CENTRE, MILL WAY, ME10 2PD
Workshop and premises Decided 21 April 2026 CHG101188665 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of a workshop and premises at Trinity Trade Centre, originally proposed at £176,000 RV (later revised) against the VO's assessment of £239,000 RV based on a main space price of £64.49/m². The tribunal found that the subject property was valued too highly when compared to other similar units at the same trade centre, and that adjustment was needed for the timing of the lease and potential fitting-out costs. The tribunal adopted a main space price of £63.00/m² with a 5% split site allowance, resulting in a revised RV of £235,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was B.S.B. ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Ladies Hosiery v West Middlesex Assessment Committee; Flight Centre (UK) limited v Ricketts; Simpsons Malt Ltd v Jones; Denton v TH White Ltd; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 23 March 2026
Similar decisions
- UNITS 56 & 57 TRINITY TRADE CENTRE, MILL WAY, ME10 2PD — Allowed in part, 21 Apr 2026
- E H Nicholls Junior, Sittingbourne Logistics Park, ME10 2FF — Dismissed, 21 Jul 2023
All decisions in Swale Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.