Tribunals · Great Yarmouth Borough Council · 2023 rating list

RICHARDS DRY DOCK AND ENGINEERING LTD, SOUTHTOWN ROAD, NR31 0JJ

Factory and premises Decided 5 August 2025 CHG101209353 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£131,000£15/m²
Ratepayer sought£89,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£118,000£14.63/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (a workboat company) challenged the rateable value of a historic boatyard, seeking reduction from £131,000 to £89,500 based on excessive mooring valuation, alleged double counting, and removal of split-site/flood-risk allowance. The tribunal upheld the £100/m mooring valuation as reasonable given site characteristics and comparable properties, rejected the double-counting claim, but allowed reinstatement of a 10% allowance for split-site disadvantages, reducing the assessment to £118,000 with effect from 22 December 2023.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Alicat Workboats Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Relief or exemption · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
18 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Great Yarmouth Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.