14 -20, GERARD,, B79 7UW
Warehouse and premises Decided 11 November 2025 CHG101215420 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants (three companies) contended that the unadjusted rate (UAR) applied to three industrial units should be reduced from £47.50/m² to £45/m². The tribunal examined rental evidence, comparable properties on the industrial estate, and rental growth statistics between 2017 and 2023. The tribunal found the £47.50/m² rate was fair and reasonable based on comparable properties and rental evidence, and dismissed two appeals; however, following a VO inspection that revealed 5 Landsberg had different floor areas than originally recorded, the tribunal allowed that appeal in part, adopting the VO's proposed assessment of £63,500 RV.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was UNIPLATE LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976]; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 20 October 2025
Similar decisions
- 39 -40, KEPLER,, B79 7XE — Mixed, 11 Nov 2025
- AT COMMUNICATE(EUROPE) LTD 5, LANDSBERG,, B79 7UL — Mixed, 11 Nov 2025
- VENTURA PARK LTD,, Apollo, B79 7TA — Allowed, 20 Sept 2022
All decisions in Tamworth Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.