Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead · 2023 rating list

UNIT 13, CORDWALLIS PARK, CLIVEMONT ROAD, SL6 7BU

Workshop and premises Decided 16 April 2026 CHG101223676 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£170,000
Ratepayer sought£144,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£160,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (UNIT 13, CORDWALLIS PARK, CLIVEMONT ROAD, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 7BU). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
UNIT 13, CORDWALLIS PARK, CLIVEMONT ROAD, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 7BUThis appeal£170,000£144,000£160,000Allowed in part
UNIT 16, CORDWALLIS PARK, CLIVEMONT ROAD, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 7BU£177,000£136,000£161,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the rateable values of two industrial units on the basis that the main space rates applied (£106.49/m² and £116.95/m²) were excessive, seeking reductions to £90/m². The tribunal found, applying the principles from Lotus and Delta v Culverwell and reviewing the rental evidence of the subject properties, comparable assessments, and the VO's size matrix, that the existing main space rates were indeed excessive. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part, reducing Unit 13 from £170,000 to £160,000 RV and Unit 16 from £177,000 to £161,000 RV, adopting main space rates of £100/m² and £105/m² respectively, as these rates more accurately reflected the attributes and rental evidence of the properties.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was OPTEX (EUROPE) LIMITED / FISHER AND PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
18 March 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.