Tribunals · Harlow District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 1, PRINCES GATE, CM20 2SU

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 3 June 2026 CHG101223880 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£101,000£102.5/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£89,000−12% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£84,000£85/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of a retail warehouse at £101,000 (£102.50 per m2), proposing £74,000 (£75 per m2). The Valuation Officer reduced it to £89,000 (£90 per m2). The Tribunal found that the subject property rent of £81,282 net per annum (analysing to £82.02 per m2), agreed in 2020 and close to the antecedent valuation date, was compelling evidence of open market rent. Although comparable assessments from the same retail park showed inconsistent patterns and different retail parks were not persuasive, the Tribunal determined that the property's location on a smaller, tucked-away retail park with limited visibility warranted an adopted price of £85 per m2, resulting in a revised RV of £84,000. The appeal was allowed in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dreams Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 May 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Harlow District Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.