Tribunals · London Borough of Lewisham · 2023 rating list

UNITS 21 & 22 CHILTONIAN ESTATE, MANOR LANE, SE12 0TX

Warehouse and premises Decided 20 May 2026 CHG101266659 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£100,000£140/m²
Ratepayer sought£84,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£100,000£140/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the tone of value for main space should be reduced from £140 per m² to £118 per m², relying primarily on comparable rental evidence from Unit 7 Chiltonian Industrial Estate. The tribunal found the appellants' case materially weakened when their representative conceded at the hearing that Unit 7 achieved a higher rent analysis of £172.31 per m², and instead found the respondent's tone of value of £140 per m² was fairly supported by a broader basket of reliable comparable evidence on the same estate, particularly Units 29B & 30 and Units 23, which were analysed at £143.85 and £132.96 per m² respectively and proximate to the antecedent valuation date.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bansal Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
22 April 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Lewisham · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.