Tribunals · City of York Council · 2010 rating list

Cheltenham & Gloucester At 25/27, Parliament Street, YO1 8RS

Decided 21 March 2023 23698825 CBRE - London

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant did not attend or submit a statement of case for the hearing. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer and sought dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 rating list to be correct due to the appellant's failure to comply with directions to disclose statements of case and the absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

No grounds were argued — the decision records none.

Evidence
None from the ratepayer

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of York Council

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.