Atm Site At 67, Stoney Lane, SO22 6EW
Decided 24 May 2022 24874839
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not appear or provide representation at the hearing and submitted no evidence. The Valuation Officer considered the appeal redundant following a list maintenance exercise after the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant had not demonstrated an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.