Atm Machine At 87/89, Magdalen Way, Gorleston, Gorleston, NR31 7AA
Decided 24 May 2022 24994069 Dunlop Heywood
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not appear or provide evidence to support the appeal. Following the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, the Valuation Officer lifted the stay on ATM-related appeals and undertook a list maintenance exercise. This particular appeal was considered redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry, and the tribunal dismissed it.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.