Atm At Store C, Chineham Centre, Chineham, Chineham, RG24 8BQ
Decided 24 May 2022 24996136 Dunlop Heywood
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was an Automatic Teller Machine appeal that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and determined this appeal to be redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was unrepresented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm Site At 30, Shakespeare Road, RG24 9DH — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.