Atm At 3, Longstock Crescent, SO40 8ED

Decided 24 May 2022 24996407 Dunlop Heywood

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This appeal concerned an ATM entry and was previously stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and considered this appeal redundant, requesting dismissal. The appellant did not attend the hearing, was not represented, and provided no evidence, so the tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Other

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk