Tribunals · Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

Atm Adj 8, York Parade, TN10 3NP

Decided 24 May 2022 24996431 Dunlop Heywood

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.

Original RV—

Ratepayer sought—

VO conceded first—

Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This ATM-related appeal was one of several hundred stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and determined this appeal to be redundant where multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The appellant did not attend or provide any evidence of an arguable case, and the tribunal dismissed the appeal accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

Validity of the proposal

Evidence: None from the ratepayer
Cases cited: Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes [2020] UKSC 21

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk