5 Goldsworth Park Centre, Denton Way, GU21 3LG
Decided 24 May 2022 24996438 Dunlop Heywood
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not attend the hearing or provide representation, and failed to submit evidence of an arguable case. The Valuation Officer had deemed this appeal redundant following a list maintenance exercise undertaken after the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, which lifted the stay on ATM-related appeals. The tribunal dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.