Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This was an ATM-related appeal that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following the release of that judgment and a list maintenance exercise by the Valuation Officer, the appeal was considered redundant as the relevant list entry had been amended or deleted. The appellant did not appear or provide any evidence of an arguable case, and the appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm Site At Morrisons Supermarket, Shuttle Street, M29 8BS — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.