Tribunals · Sheffield City Council · 2010 rating list

The Sheaf Island, Ecclesall Road, S11 8HW

Public house and premises Decided 4 April 2022 25141228 BNP Real Estate - Birmingham

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£153,000
Ratepayer sought£55,000
VO conceded first£107,000−30% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£107,000from 17 Sept 2010

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (J D Wetherspoon plc) challenged the rateable value of £153,000 on the grounds that the Fair Maintainable Trade (FMT) adopted was excessive, arguing it did not account for the appellant's lower pricing policy and brand which generated higher turnover than comparable properties. The appellant proposed £55,000 RV citing differences in location and comparable properties with lower rateable values. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, accepting the Valuation Officer's revised figure of £107,000 RV, finding insufficient 'like for like' comparable evidence to justify the appellant's lower proposed valuation, though accepting some adjustment was necessary for the appellant's business model.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was J D Wetherspoon plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Hearing
2 March 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Sheffield City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.