Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2010 rating list

146-150 Castle Square, B29 5PT

Decided 3 March 2023 25169065 Rogerson & Associates

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant did not attend or submit a statement of case to the tribunal hearing held on notice. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer regarding the correctness of the 2010 rating list entry. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, satisfied that the entry was correct given the appellant's failure to advance any substantive argument disputing the rateable value.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.