Tribunals · London Borough of Tower Hamlets · 2010 rating list

Atm Site At 161-163, Commercial Road, E1 2DA

Decided 3 March 2023 25380376 Montagu Evans - Rating

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant failed to attend the hearing or provide a statement of case to the Tribunal or Valuation Officer. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer regarding the rateable value entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list. Given the appellant's serious failure to comply with Tribunal directions and the absence of any substantive argument disputing the valuation, the Tribunal was satisfied that the entry in the rating list for the subject hereditament is correct and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

No grounds were argued — the decision records none.

Evidence
None from the ratepayer

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.