36 Borough Pavement Grange Precinct, CH41 2XX
Decided 3 March 2023 25446563 Fisher Hargreaves Proctor
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to submit a statement of case and did not attend or send a representative to the hearing. The Valuation Officer argued there was no case to answer. The tribunal found the appellant's non-compliance with disclosure directions was serious and, in the absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value, upheld the entry in the 2010 rating list.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 27, TARRAN WAY NORTH,, CH46 4UA — Allowed, 8 Dec 2025
- UNITS 14 -15, TARRAN WAY WEST,, CH46 4TT — Allowed, 8 Dec 2025
- FEEDWATER SERVICES LTD AT 16, TARRAN WAY,, CH46 4TU — Allowed, 8 Dec 2025
- 4 Trinity Chambers (Unit 3), Ivy Street, CH41 5EF — Dismissed, 13 Dec 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.