Somerfield, Horsefair, PE13 1AR
Decided 3 March 2023 25466584 Rogerson & Associates
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to submit a statement of case or attend the hearing. The Valuation Officer argued there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on the basis that the appellant had failed to comply with tribunal directions on disclosure and there was no substantive argument disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Somerfield, Horsefair, PE13 1AR — Dismissed, 3 Mar 2023
- Somerfield, Horsefair, PE13 1AR — Dismissed, 3 Mar 2023
- Somerfield, Horsefair, PE13 1AR — Dismissed, 3 Mar 2023
- 30 High Street, PE16 6BG — Allowed in part, 18 May 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.