Tribunals · Amber Valley Borough Council

Atm Site At Tesco, Hall Street, DE55 7BT

Decided 24 May 2022 25474394 Rapleys LLP

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant did not attend or provide any evidence or submissions regarding their ATM-related rating list appeal. Following the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes and subsequent list maintenance exercise by the Valuation Officer, this appeal was considered redundant and was dismissed as the appellant failed to demonstrate an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Other
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes

Similar decisions

All decisions in Amber Valley Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.