Atm Site At 7/9, Bridge Street, OL14 5AQ
Decided 24 May 2022 25482364 Johnson Fellows
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant appealed against an ATM-related list entry. Following the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, the tribunal lifted its stay and the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise, concluding that this appeal was redundant as duplicate appeals against the same entry had been lodged. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes [2020] UKSC 21
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.