Tribunals · Lichfield District Council

At 28 Birmingham Road, Lichfield, Lichfield, WS14 0JR

Decided 24 May 2022 25489142 Rapleys LLP

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appeal concerned an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) entry and was one of several hundred similar appeals that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise and determined this appeal was redundant following review and discussions with interested parties. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant did not attend or provide evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Other
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes (VO) and Others [2020] UKSC 21

Similar decisions

All decisions in Lichfield District Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.