Tribunals · Stoke-on-Trent City Council

Atm At Tesco Express, Biddulph Road, ST6 6SH

Decided 24 May 2022 25489486 Rapleys LLP

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appeal was one of several hundred ATM-related appeals previously stayed pending the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes. Following the judgment, the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance and determined this appeal redundant. The tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant did not appear or provide evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes

Similar decisions

All decisions in Stoke-on-Trent City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.