Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2010 rating list

146-150 Castle Square, B29 5PT

Decided 3 March 2023 25497443 Rogerson & Associates

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The Appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions regarding disclosure of statements of case and did not attend or submit representations at the hearing. The Valuation Officer argued there was no case to answer. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list to be correct.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
None from the ratepayer

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.