6-8 North Parade, M33 3JS
Decided 24 May 2022 25502842 Johnson Fellows
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appeal concerned an ATM-related entry that was part of a large batch of appeals stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment, the Valuation Officer conducted a list maintenance exercise and determined this appeal was redundant due to multiple appeals against the same list entry. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.